Audit the evidence first
Section 61.57(c) uses a six-calendar-month lookback for the listed instrument tasks in the covered aircraft categories. Record dates, aircraft or approved device, approaches, holding work, intercepting/tracking work, conditions, and any other logging detail needed to establish what was actually accomplished.
Do not use a slogan as a decision tree
Pilots often describe a 'grace period,' but the safe method is to read 61.57(c) and (d) together using exact calendar months and the current date. Determine whether the tasks can be reestablished under the rule or whether an IPC is required before acting as PIC under IFR or in weather below VFR minimums.
Currency is not proficiency
Six approaches do not describe their quality, weather, complexity, automation use, or recency distribution. A pilot can satisfy recent-experience logging and still need dual work before a demanding trip.
Bring a useful IPC brief
Give the CFII the evidence audit, the avionics actually used, recent approach types, weak tasks, intended IFR mission, and failure or automation concerns. AC 61-98E and the applicable testing standards help frame an IPC, but the instructor must use current requirements and judgment.
Put it into action
Instrument Currency & IPC Reboot
Figure out whether you need six approaches, an IPC, or just a safety pilot — then show up with the evidence organized and a plan.
See what’s insideEducational information only. Verify current regulations and FAA guidance, the approved documents for the aircraft or operation, and guidance from an appropriately qualified instructor before acting.